Skip to main content

Why was he Christ?

Sarangi, Abinash says:
Philosophy like a fingerprint is the only attribute which is unique to a person"

Pant, Shailesh says:
guddddddd 1
Pant, Shailesh says:
really gud 1...
Pant, Shailesh says:
its sort of a spiritual fingerprint...
Pant, Shailesh says:
very unique to soul.... But... hang on a minute...
Pant, Shailesh says:
if there is only ONE God, n v r the perceptual manifestation of the same ONE, how can there be different spiritual fingerprints... i.e. different philosophies...

Sarangi, Abinash says:
Let me give an analogy for it..

Pant, Shailesh says:
thts bring to the conclusion tht for gud there is only one philosophy underneath all the seemingly varied expressions... n tht i thinkg is LOVE...

Sarangi, Abinash says:
Like all the fingers are part of the same hand or same body for that matter but all the fingers are of different sizes and finger prints...
Sarangi, Abinash says:
Still they origin from the same source bodya nd same main trunk

Pant, Shailesh says:
i guess thts why Christ said tht only three thing matter... Faith, Hope and Love... n among them the supreme is LOVE!!!

Sarangi, Abinash says:
Just that that exist with different faces..
Sarangi, Abinash says:
Yeah.
Sarangi, Abinash says:
Correct.
Sarangi, Abinash says:
Becasue underneath any philosophy these three are the prime drivers and the supreme motto

Pant, Shailesh says:
i think he waz perfectly right and sublime, though succint, but encompassing everthing that is there to it!!!!
Pant, Shailesh says:
gr8 man!!! what an expression he had, the summum bonum of everthing!!!

Sarangi, Abinash says:
Yeah. Thast why He was christ
Sarangi, Abinash says:
:)

Comments

dhaundy said…
"Philosophy like a fingerprint is the only attribute which is unique to a person"

I kinda love people who utter frills with so much conviction that it sounds true!

Philosophy is seldom unique to a person because it is based on rational thinking. Rational views (by definition) should converge, and not limit to an individual.

Since rest of the argument is based on what I think is frilled... I refuse to be thrilled ;)
July 2, 2008 at 8:01 AM
abinash said…
Quite correct. But the statement philosophy is unique to a person is still correct, for the fact that even rational views are perceived personally. More rational thinking and rational view are two different things. View is the out come of thinking. What we grant. So rational view how ever can converge but not thinking. Rational thinking or philosophy for that matter is just as unique as an individual influenced by the beliefs and credos one follows.
July 4, 2008 at 5:22 AM
dhaundy said…
"...for the fact that even rational views are perceived personally"

That is gross generalization. For that matter, all the five senses are percieved personally. We both agree that red is red but I can never know what your red is like.

This is wikipedia's take on Philosophy: "Philosophy is distinguished from other ways of addressing these questions (such as mysticism or mythology) by its critical, generally systematic approach and its reliance on reasoned argument"

Thinking is unique, no doubt. But Philosophy is a subset that's based on reason.

Mathematically, if you have a boolen statement (one person argument), I can always add redundancy to it to create multiple statements (lots of people) that still evaluate to same final result (common philosophy)
July 21, 2008 at 12:46 AM
HellDev said…
I reiterate, as i also said in that deeply superficial chat, that philospohy, if it is any good and intended for a more generalized wholesomeness of, let's say life itself, has to converge. Its seeming diversities are only at the surface, the river run deep. And as for water its still the same, top or bottom, just the perceptions makes the difference. But one should never make the mistake of mistaking perceptions for actual underlying philosophy.

Perceptions dont make philosophy, which is generally believed. I think its mostly the other way round. I mite be wrong though!!! ;)
July 30, 2008 at 10:27 AM
dhaundy said…
And as for water its still the same...

You summed it up, bro... there's nothing to debate now... arguing suddenly seems such a waste of intellect :(

On lighter side... ha ha
July 30, 2008 at 10:51 AM
abinash said…
"arguing suddenly seems such a waste of intellect :("

Always valid. I agree. :)
Good analogy shallu bhai. :)
August 1, 2008 at 4:02 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Blogging Machines

 The recent craze around #NLP #AI assistant #ChatGPT is something that every individual, tech/non-tech irrespective, should pay rapt attention to. Within the first few hours of exploring this tool, i almost felt like talking to Jarvis Version 0.01 - something thats no Tony Stark, but can turn him into IronMan.  Experimented with it to write poems, to code snippets, to iterate over the current context of conversation to improve over the previous versions of responses and every time i was almost struck with awe for what brave world we might be marching towards. The applicability is not just for tech world by the way, as we will see, the following content/blogpost is created solely by ChatGPT. I started with asking a simple request -  Write a blog about #emergingtech on #containers   and voila here it is Subsequently i requested to "continue on this blog" and since its fully context aware it went on detailing more To further test its capability to "generate context...
Post a Comment
Read more

...... 2nd Continuance .........

…. the moment the individual starts listening to this seemingly meandering question (which in so called “ practical” aspects of life might seem like a query which is sort of self destructive, which it actually is , but to a better end) the individual’s individuality, in the initial stage of self realization, seems to be going for a toss and the tussle of the ego makes it appear more worse than it actually is. The person goes through a series of swings of emotional jeopardy, but one needs to have enough faith in oneself, to overcome this passing phase, out of which one will surely come out triumphant; a better person, if I may add. It might seem to the individual that the easiest way out is to give up on the ongoing internal war of the ego ( egos , if I may say so, will get to this detail later on…), in which generally the ego wins, and the individual is veiled from the obvious fact that he/she has actually reacted in the wrong manner. On top of it, if the situation alters according to...
1 comment
Read more