Skip to main content

Why was he Christ?

Sarangi, Abinash says:
Philosophy like a fingerprint is the only attribute which is unique to a person"

Pant, Shailesh says:
guddddddd 1
Pant, Shailesh says:
really gud 1...
Pant, Shailesh says:
its sort of a spiritual fingerprint...
Pant, Shailesh says:
very unique to soul.... But... hang on a minute...
Pant, Shailesh says:
if there is only ONE God, n v r the perceptual manifestation of the same ONE, how can there be different spiritual fingerprints... i.e. different philosophies...

Sarangi, Abinash says:
Let me give an analogy for it..

Pant, Shailesh says:
thts bring to the conclusion tht for gud there is only one philosophy underneath all the seemingly varied expressions... n tht i thinkg is LOVE...

Sarangi, Abinash says:
Like all the fingers are part of the same hand or same body for that matter but all the fingers are of different sizes and finger prints...
Sarangi, Abinash says:
Still they origin from the same source bodya nd same main trunk

Pant, Shailesh says:
i guess thts why Christ said tht only three thing matter... Faith, Hope and Love... n among them the supreme is LOVE!!!

Sarangi, Abinash says:
Just that that exist with different faces..
Sarangi, Abinash says:
Yeah.
Sarangi, Abinash says:
Correct.
Sarangi, Abinash says:
Becasue underneath any philosophy these three are the prime drivers and the supreme motto

Pant, Shailesh says:
i think he waz perfectly right and sublime, though succint, but encompassing everthing that is there to it!!!!
Pant, Shailesh says:
gr8 man!!! what an expression he had, the summum bonum of everthing!!!

Sarangi, Abinash says:
Yeah. Thast why He was christ
Sarangi, Abinash says:
:)

Comments

dhaundy said…
"Philosophy like a fingerprint is the only attribute which is unique to a person"

I kinda love people who utter frills with so much conviction that it sounds true!

Philosophy is seldom unique to a person because it is based on rational thinking. Rational views (by definition) should converge, and not limit to an individual.

Since rest of the argument is based on what I think is frilled... I refuse to be thrilled ;)
July 2, 2008 at 8:01 AM
abinash said…
Quite correct. But the statement philosophy is unique to a person is still correct, for the fact that even rational views are perceived personally. More rational thinking and rational view are two different things. View is the out come of thinking. What we grant. So rational view how ever can converge but not thinking. Rational thinking or philosophy for that matter is just as unique as an individual influenced by the beliefs and credos one follows.
July 4, 2008 at 5:22 AM
dhaundy said…
"...for the fact that even rational views are perceived personally"

That is gross generalization. For that matter, all the five senses are percieved personally. We both agree that red is red but I can never know what your red is like.

This is wikipedia's take on Philosophy: "Philosophy is distinguished from other ways of addressing these questions (such as mysticism or mythology) by its critical, generally systematic approach and its reliance on reasoned argument"

Thinking is unique, no doubt. But Philosophy is a subset that's based on reason.

Mathematically, if you have a boolen statement (one person argument), I can always add redundancy to it to create multiple statements (lots of people) that still evaluate to same final result (common philosophy)
July 21, 2008 at 12:46 AM
HellDev said…
I reiterate, as i also said in that deeply superficial chat, that philospohy, if it is any good and intended for a more generalized wholesomeness of, let's say life itself, has to converge. Its seeming diversities are only at the surface, the river run deep. And as for water its still the same, top or bottom, just the perceptions makes the difference. But one should never make the mistake of mistaking perceptions for actual underlying philosophy.

Perceptions dont make philosophy, which is generally believed. I think its mostly the other way round. I mite be wrong though!!! ;)
July 30, 2008 at 10:27 AM
dhaundy said…
And as for water its still the same...

You summed it up, bro... there's nothing to debate now... arguing suddenly seems such a waste of intellect :(

On lighter side... ha ha
July 30, 2008 at 10:51 AM
abinash said…
"arguing suddenly seems such a waste of intellect :("

Always valid. I agree. :)
Good analogy shallu bhai. :)
August 1, 2008 at 4:02 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

...... 2nd Continuance .........

…. the moment the individual starts listening to this seemingly meandering question (which in so called “ practical” aspects of life might seem like a query which is sort of self destructive, which it actually is , but to a better end) the individual’s individuality, in the initial stage of self realization, seems to be going for a toss and the tussle of the ego makes it appear more worse than it actually is. The person goes through a series of swings of emotional jeopardy, but one needs to have enough faith in oneself, to overcome this passing phase, out of which one will surely come out triumphant; a better person, if I may add. It might seem to the individual that the easiest way out is to give up on the ongoing internal war of the ego ( egos , if I may say so, will get to this detail later on…), in which generally the ego wins, and the individual is veiled from the obvious fact that he/she has actually reacted in the wrong manner. On top of it, if the situation alters according to
1 comment
Read more

A New Old Subject: First Love

What is so enigmatic about the emotion or thought that constitutes the realms of so called First Love , will be something that will keep every one who's been through that state bothered for as long as they keep breathing . What pesters those who have failed in it, is not the failure if shared, but the rejection because of something they didn’t possess and that’s bound to be natural since they wanted it so bad that they start pondering about the criteria they couldn’t fulfill, norms they couldn’t adhere to, spark they couldn’t provide, feelings they couldn’t ignite, etc, etc, etc…. Is it for real? That’s the first doubt that clouds the mind if one tries to sneak into the problem domain by being a rational animal, and what follows is a long list of questions unanswered, desires unfulfilled and dreams unrealized which linger on even when the person decides to forgo. Let me just ask one question to all of us, is it worth it? I mean, come on, so what o
1 comment
Read more