Skip to main content

Is it worth tagging FIRST???

Benjamin Disraeli once said “The magic of first love is our ignorance that it can never end.". I can’t agree with him more, considering the fact that the emotional flow is so damn hard to get over that one starts feeling completely paralyzed by it, at least the logic is paralyzed. Now couple it with a lot of dreams one builds on the shoulders of the success of their so called first love, intoxicate it with the seeming impossibility to the one in love that it can’t be fulfilled in any other way or even by other person;

Result: - The person becomes so dependent on one individual that his/her individuality seems to be merging with the beloved. On surface it seems a very romantic and very real thing, deep down it means plain old dependency.

The ancient Indian philosophy’s single and consummate concept of non-attachment doesn’t mean not to love someone or something, for that matter, as it is generally misinterpreted. It actually means love something or someone whole heartedly, but when the time calls for, never ever hesitate a bit to leave it, with no regrets at all, at all.

It’s rightly said true love frees, but never ever bounds, in any way. If your love does that, then its worth tagging as first and second and the last, for that matter, otherwise, it’s just an error in long list of trials one goes through in life, ‘cause what worth is first love when it’s not true?

Comments

abinash said…
Well! Fair enouggh but you be in love or not. Dependancy is there. Man or anyother living being can't exist with out depending. I think the more appropriate word would be "self sufficiency". We degrade ourself sufficieny to survive lonliness, stress, agony and physical needs. We give in to our emotional demand (mind the choice of word demand not need) and forget out sublim soul. We compromise the "me" in us and we claim to be in love. My views on love is kinda Click Here this.

Popular posts from this blog

Why was he Christ?

Sarangi, Abinash says: Philosophy like a fingerprint is the only attribute which is unique to a person" Pant, Shailesh says: guddddddd 1 Pant, Shailesh says: really gud 1... Pant, Shailesh says: its sort of a spiritual fingerprint... Pant, Shailesh says: very unique to soul.... But... hang on a minute... Pant, Shailesh says: if there is only ONE God, n v r the perceptual manifestation of the same ONE, how can there be different spiritual fingerprints... i.e. different philosophies... Sarangi, Abinash says: Let me give an analogy for it.. Pant, Shailesh says: thts bring to the conclusion tht for gud there is only one philosophy underneath all the seemingly varied expressions... n tht i thinkg is LOVE... Sarangi, Abinash says: Like all the fingers are part of the same hand or same body for that matter but all the fingers are of different sizes and finger prints... Sarangi, Abinash says: Still they origin from the same source bodya nd same main trunk Pant, Shailesh says: i guess tht...

Blogging Machines

 The recent craze around #NLP #AI assistant #ChatGPT is something that every individual, tech/non-tech irrespective, should pay rapt attention to. Within the first few hours of exploring this tool, i almost felt like talking to Jarvis Version 0.01 - something thats no Tony Stark, but can turn him into IronMan.  Experimented with it to write poems, to code snippets, to iterate over the current context of conversation to improve over the previous versions of responses and every time i was almost struck with awe for what brave world we might be marching towards. The applicability is not just for tech world by the way, as we will see, the following content/blogpost is created solely by ChatGPT. I started with asking a simple request -  Write a blog about #emergingtech on #containers   and voila here it is Subsequently i requested to "continue on this blog" and since its fully context aware it went on detailing more To further test its capability to "generate context...

...... 2nd Continuance .........

…. the moment the individual starts listening to this seemingly meandering question (which in so called “ practical” aspects of life might seem like a query which is sort of self destructive, which it actually is , but to a better end) the individual’s individuality, in the initial stage of self realization, seems to be going for a toss and the tussle of the ego makes it appear more worse than it actually is. The person goes through a series of swings of emotional jeopardy, but one needs to have enough faith in oneself, to overcome this passing phase, out of which one will surely come out triumphant; a better person, if I may add. It might seem to the individual that the easiest way out is to give up on the ongoing internal war of the ego ( egos , if I may say so, will get to this detail later on…), in which generally the ego wins, and the individual is veiled from the obvious fact that he/she has actually reacted in the wrong manner. On top of it, if the situation alters according to...